冬季恋歌

原标题：【国际锐评】想搞“核”暗箱操作的美英澳又被亮红灯美英澳三国小圈子想搞暗箱操作把核潜艇合作“洗白白”，结果迎来第四次失败。    There has been an ongoing discussion about work-life balance and appropriate work hours in the film industry, especially since reports emerged of Deepika Padukone requesting an 8-hour shift after becoming a mother. She was reportedly made to quit two big projects, Spirit and Kalki 2898’s sequel due to these requests. Over recent months, many celebs have shared their perspectives on the 8-hour shift debate. Rakul Preet Singh has now shared her thoughts on this controversy, sharing her belief that a single rule cannot apply to everyone. She further explained that individuals have the right to determine their work hours based on their current life circumstances. She highlighted that one would not expect Amitabh Bachchan to work 14 hours a day given his age. Similarly, every actor is entitled to make such decisions based on their personal priorities.           During a conversation with Siddharth Kannan, Rakul Preet Singh said, “I feel that working hours are very subjective to where you are in your life right now. How you were at the age of 16 is not how you are at the age of 25, is not how you are at the age of 35, and so on. So there is never one rule for anybody. You wouldn’t expect Amitabh sir to work 14 hours, right? So it is very subjective.”          She further added, “Every person has the right to decide that in this phase of my life, I want to give this much time to my family, or work for this many hours. And if I can’t do more than that, then I will unfortunately have to let go. Everybody has the right to decide how much they want to work.           She also shared her belief that a single set of rules may not be universally applicable, as priorities tend to change throughout different stages of life. She shared, “I am sure those who work 8 hours today have worked a lot earlier. They have even worked 48 hours straight. Like Ajay sir, Akshay sir- in the 90s, they would go from one film set to another. They would change only their shirts while wearing the same jeans. That also used to happen. And now they have reached a point that they can decide how much work they want to do. So you transition with time and with where you are in life.”Also Read; Ranveer Singh and Rakul Preet Singh jazz up the airport paparazzi scene。12日，国际原子能机构理事会会议第四次协商一致决定，以单独正式议题形式讨论美英澳核潜艇合作有关问题。这意味着，三国核潜艇合作不是三国可以私自处理的，必须由机构成员国共同来管。一年前的9月15日，美英澳宣布建立三边安全合作伙伴（奥库斯AUKUS），核心计划是美英将协助澳大利亚打造核动力潜艇。这其中涉及的核武器材料转让本质上是核扩散，它将加剧军备竞赛，破坏地区和平稳定，严重冲击国际核不扩散体系，因此引发国际社会极大关切。美英澳都是《不扩散核武器条约》的缔约国，理应履行核不扩散义务。但三国无视国际原子能机构理事会以协商一致方式通过的核潜艇合作相关议题，另起炉灶，企图同机构秘书处擅自谈判核潜艇合作保障监督安排，以遮掩核扩散行径。无论它们玩什么花样，都无法改变一个基本事实：三国核潜艇合作涉及武器级浓缩铀及相关技术、设备的转让，存在严重核扩散风险，违反《不扩散核武器条约》的目的和宗旨，超出了国际原子能机构秘书处的职责范围，必须由机构成员国共同讨论决定。现在，国际原子能机构理事会会议连续四次挫败美英澳的暗箱操作，说明大家都看清了奥库斯的本质就是搞拉帮结伙、冷战对抗那一套，看清美英一边就朝核、伊核问题表达关切、一边在同澳核潜艇合作问题上“开绿灯”，是典型的双标。从去年9月奥库斯成立，到当年11月签署《海军核动力信息交换协议》、正式允许澳获取美英机密的核潜艇信息，再到今年3月澳声称将在东海岸建造一个新潜艇基地、用来停靠澳未来的核潜艇并支持美英核潜艇定期访问，这一系列举动让地区国家越来越不安。中国、印度尼西亚等国都向8月份举行的《不扩散核武器条约》第十次审议大会提交了工作文件，就核动力潜艇合作引发的核扩散风险提出诸多关切。然而到目前，美英澳三国没有回应国际社会关切，仍在核潜艇合作细节上遮遮掩掩，还霸道地给国际原子能机构有效实施监管出难题。这个盎格鲁—撒克逊小圈子想在亚太地区干什么，大家都能看出来——无非是想将北约挑动地区冲突对抗的老套路复制到亚太地区。

二 | 印尼战略与国际研究中心资深研究员及联合创始人尤素福·瓦南迪表示，美英澳三国核潜艇合作，使地区陷入严重的核扩散风险，印尼各方表示强烈愤怒。

三 | 核武器是悬在人类头上的“达摩克利斯之剑”。联合国秘书长古特雷斯警告说，目前核武器被使用的风险可能是冷战时代以来最高的。美英澳核潜艇合作绝不是它们的私事，更不能由它们说了算。如何履行防扩散义务，三国必须给世界一个交代，它们别想把“核”谋藏进暗箱。

四 | （国际锐评评论员）返回搜狐，查看更多责任编辑：