中国有嘻哈

Colorado court upholds Google keyword search warrant which led to arrests in fatal arson_我的网站

A |     DENVER -- Colorado’s highest court on Monday upheld the search of Google users' keyword history to identify suspects in a 2020 fatal arson fire, an approach that critics have called a digital dragnet that threatens to undermine people's privacy and their constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. However the Colorado Supreme Court cautioned it was not making a “broad proclamation” on the constitutionality of such warrants and emphasized it was ruling on the facts of just this one case.At issue before the court was a search warrant from Denver police requiring Google to provide the IP addresses of anyone who had searched over 15 days for the address of the home that was set on fire, killing five immigrants from the West African nation of Senegal. After some back and forth over how Google would be able to provide information without violating its privacy policy, Google produced a spreadsheet of sixty-one searches made by eight accounts. Google provided the IP addresses for those accounts, but no names. Five of the IP addresses were based in Colorado and police obtained the names of those people through another search warrant. After investigating those people, police eventually identified three teens as suspects.One of them, Gavin Seymour, asked the court to throw the evidence out because it violated the Fourth Amendment's ban on unreasonable searches and seizures by being overbroad and not being targeted against a specific person suspected of a crime. Search warrants to gather evidence are typically sought once police have identified a suspect and gathered some probable cause to believe they committed a crime. But in this case, the trail had run cold and police were seeking a “reverse keyword” warrant for the Google search history in a quest to identify possible suspects. Since the attack seemed targeted, investigators believed whoever set fire to the house would have searched for directions to it.The state Supreme Court ruled that Seymour had a constitutionally protected privacy interest in his Google search history even though it was just connected with an IP address and not his name. While it also said it assumes that the warrant was “constitutionally defective” for not specifying an “individualized probable cause”, the court said it would not throw out the evidence because police were acting in good faith under what was known about the law at the time. The court said it was not aware of any other state supreme court or federal appellate court that has dealt with this type of warrant before.“Our finding of good faith today neither condones nor condemns all such warrants in the future. If dystopian problems emerge, as some fear, the courts stand ready to hear argument regarding how we should rein in law enforcement’s use of rapidly advancing technology. Today, we proceed incrementally based on the facts before us," it said. In a dissent, Justice Monica Marquez said such a wide-ranging search of a billion Google users' search history without a particular target is exactly the kind the Fourth Amendment was designed to stop.“At the risk of sounding alarmist, I fear that by upholding this practice, the majority’s ruling today gives constitutional cover to law enforcement seeking unprecedented access to the private lives of individuals not just in Colorado, but across the globe. And I fear that today’s decision invites courts nationwide to do the same,” she said in the dissent, which Justice Carlos Samour joined in. In a statement, Google said it was important that the court's ruling recognized the privacy and First Amendment interests involved in keyword searches. “With all law enforcement demands, including reverse warrants, we have a rigorous process designed to protect the privacy of our users while supporting the important work of law enforcement,” it said. The ruling allows the prosecution of Seymour and Kevin Bui, who were 16 at the time of the Aug. 5, 2020, fire, to move ahead in adult court on charges of first-degree murder, attempted murder, arson and burglary. Investigators allege Bui organized the attack on the home because he mistakenly believed people who had stolen his iPhone during a robbery lived there.Telephone messages and an email sent to Seymour's lawyers, Jenifer Stinson and Michael Juba, were not immediately returned. A lawyer for Bui, Christian Earle, could not be reached for comment. A third teen, Dillon Siebert, who was 14 at the time and originally charged as a juvenile, pleaded guilty earlier this year to second-degree murder in adult court under a deal that prosecutors and the defense said balanced his lesser role in planning the fire, his remorse and interest in rehabilitation with the horror of the crime. He was sentenced to 10 years behind bars.。    在2026年科隆游戏展Opening Night Live发布会上，战略与经营游戏开发商及发行商Paradox Interactive公布《后世更序》（Afterworld），这是 Paradox Development Studio 开发的全新大战略游戏，即将登陆 PC 平台。游戏设定在原创的末日后北美：遍布危险地形、危险的旧世界废墟和绝望的人类残部。玩家将带领一小群幸存者踏上建立横跨大陆的帝国之路，面对战略挑战与道德危机。视频欣赏：     《后世更序》是 Paradox Development Studio，《十字军之王 3》与《钢铁雄心 4》的开发者，带来的全新大战略游戏，拥有深度且富含故事的末日背景。带领你的幸存者团结起来，定义部落的精神，建立你的帝国。

B | 这款游戏易上手，但难以生存——从规模小、易接近的开局，成长为丰富而复杂的战略体验，一如你对 Paradox 游戏的期待。“Afterworld 是 Paradox 十年来第一个非历史题材的作品，我迫不及待想看到玩家用它讲述什么样的故事。”Paradox Development Studio《后世更序》游戏总监 Dan Lind 表示，“这是我们很久以来第一次从头构建的世界，也是第一次有幸能在游戏开始之前就把它毁灭掉。旧世界的碎片仍散落各处，等待被发现。它之后会发生什么，完全取决于玩家。

C | ”《后世更序》将玩家置于程序生成的北美废土中，每次游玩都会创造一个全新的战略沙盒，涌现出不同的故事。玩家首先要面对搜寻食物、水和住所的挑战，同时重新发现文明的基本方法；随后是为日益壮大的部落制定法律与伦理的艰难抉择；最终与其他崛起的帝国正面对抗，决定这片大陆的命运。《后世更序》核心特性：在废土中重生，探索新的文明     •以从年久失修的核掩体中爬出的避难者身份，或是在尘原中寻找女神的狂热者身份，又或是其他几个可选起源之一，开始游戏。在荒原中建立最初的定居点，并决定你的人民成为怎样的民族。 •在致命的环境中，勉强搜集食物、水和燃料。寻觅稀缺资源，令队伍本就微薄的力量更显捉襟见肘；然而，在你的引导下，他们将掌握新技能、学会新方法，去提炼这片土地上失落的财富。•探索一个程序生成的北美。地形与地貌似曾相识，但资源、部落与威胁每一次都截然不同。每次游玩，都是一个充满涌现式故事的崭新战略沙盒。

D | •通过探索重新发现失落的科技。《后世更序》的动态科技树会根据你的实际发现和经历解锁新的进步。

E | 遇到河流便学会灌溉。

F | 接触新部落便发现有组织的宗教。你的行动塑造了你社会可能的未来。

G | •组织车队和补给线以开发新发现的财富，或在土地干涸时举族迁徙。你最初的定居点未必永远是首都，而劫掠对手始终是一个选项。结伴出征还是独自作战     •决定信任谁。遭遇敌对部落，谈判交易，将流浪部落吸收进你日益壮大的国家，或用武力夺取所需。

H | 他人既是你最大的资源，也是最大的威胁。•起草新社会的律法。

I | 决定谁能获得稀缺物资，谁能在领导层发声，以及你的国家为何而存续。新的发现和危机将不断重塑你人民的需求，迫使你做出艰难抉择，这些抉择没有轻松答案。•寻找陨灭前科技留下的强大遗迹，它们能重写你国家能力所及的规则——如果你能率先将其据为己有。但要小心：终结旧世界的那种力量，同样也能终结新世界。•在残酷竞争的多人模式或合作模式中，独自或与他人一同征服尘原。捍卫帝国，重塑世界     •在重新发现的美洲大陆上扩张。随着领土被填满和资源枯竭，要么结盟，要么为控制所剩之物而进行残酷的战争。

J | 第二次崩溃永远只隔着一个糟糕的决策。•做出能回响数代人的抉择。有成千上万的生命取决于你的决策，一次食物短缺可能导致一场饥荒，一次政治失误可能使你的国家分崩离析。为了维系你的帝国，你愿意牺牲一切吗？•揭开旧世界尘封的历史，直面重建的道德重压。配给关键资源，驾驭新宗教的崛起，并决定你的社会如何对待变异者和改造人。每一次危机都塑造着你帝国的灵魂。

K |  •对抗古族——那些陨灭前依靠被遗忘科技得以永生的不朽领袖们。他们对谁该统治有着自己的愿景，且不会悄然退让。•定义你帝国的真正品格，追寻你的天命。你会重拾旧道吗？ 寻求开明之路以避免重蹈过去的覆辙？ 你的帝国能否从灰烬之中巍然屹立？玩家现可在Steam商店页面将《后世更序》加入愿望单     更多相关资讯请关注：后世更序专区。

Current article:http://www.chenzhuaigecoupuhongyuntuizei.sbs/jf015c/xm9.html

Published on:09:03:17