一 | 近日，有市民反映，已运营21年的济南柏宁水族宠物用品交易广场或将于10月底闭市。 COLUMBUS, Ohio -- With Election Day closing in, anti-abortion groups seeking to build opposition to a reproductive rights measure in Ohio are messaging heavily around a term for an abortion procedure that was once used later in pregnancy — but hasn't been legal in the U.S. for over 15 years.In ads, debates and public statements, the opposition campaign and top Republicans have increasingly been referencing “partial-birth abortions” as an imminent threat if voters approve the constitutional amendment on Nov. 7. “Partial-birth abortion” is a non-medical term for a procedure known as dilation and extraction, or D&X, which is already federally prohibited.“It would allow a partial-birth abortion,” Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine told reporters recently as he explained his opposition to the constitutional amendment, known as Issue 1. “For many years, in Ohio and in this country, we’ve had a law that said a partial-birth abortion — where the child is partially delivered and then killed and then finally delivered — was illegal in Ohio,” the governor continued. “This constitutional amendment would override that.” Constitutional scholars say that is not true and that the amendment would not override the existing federal ban if Ohio voters approve it.“So changing our constitution will not affect in the slightest way the applicability of the federal partial-birth abortion ban,” said Dan Kobil, a law professor at Capital University in Columbus, who supports abortion rights. “It would be a federal crime for a doctor to violate that ban."That's because the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution calls for federal laws to trump state laws, said Jonathan Entin, professor emeritus of law at Case Western State University.“If the federal law prohibits a particular technique, then that’s going to prevail over a state law that might be inconsistent,” he said.Ohio is the only state this November where voters will decide whether abortion should be legal. But the debate isn’t happening in isolation. The state has been used as a campaign testing ground by anti-abortion groups after a string of defeats since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a constitutional right to the procedure. And next year, abortion rights supporters are planning to put the question before voters in several more states, ensuring the issue will be central to races up and down the ballot.A D&X procedure involved dilating the woman’s cervix, then pulling the fetus through the cervix, feet-first to the neck. The head was then punctured and the skull emptied and compressed to allow the fetus to fit through the dilated cervix. Before the federal ban, it was used for both abortions and miscarriages in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.DeWine was serving in the U.S. Senate when the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act was passed in 2003. He voted for the prohibition, which declared a “moral, medical, and ethical consensus” that the procedure was “gruesome and inhumane.” President George W. Bush signed the measure into law with DeWine at his side.The ban was largely on hold while a constitutional challenge played out. The U.S. Supreme Court in 2007 rejected arguments against the law, upholding its application across all 50 states.Asked why the governor suggested a federal law he supported would not apply if Ohio changes its constitution, spokesman Dan Tierney said DeWine bases his position on provisions of the U.S. Constitution that prevent the federal government from regulating conduct that has no effect on interstate commerce. Kobil acknowledged that argument, but said it’s “almost certain to fail” if tested, given that the Supreme Court already declared the ban constitutional.DeWine isn't the only top elected Republican in the state to warn that the procedure would be revived if the amendment passes on Nov. 7.In a memo earlier this month, Republican Attorney General Dave Yost said the state’s laws outlawing abortions through D&X and another procedure, non-intact dilation and evacuation, or D&E, the most common second trimester method, “would both be invalidated and these abortions would be permitted” if the amendment passes. The Ohio Senate’s Republican supermajority passed a resolution saying something similar.Entin, of Case Western, said “to the extent that the Ohio laws he’s discussed are also covered by the federal law, it doesn’t matter,” because federally banned procedures would remain illegal.Kelsey Pritchard, director of state public affairs for Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, whose political arm is a major funder of the campaign opposing the amendment, said the federal ban “lacks enforcement” under a Biden Administration she described as “extreme pro-abortion.”“If it's not being enforced, if there's no teeth to it, then the protections need to happen at the state level,” argued spokesperson Amy Natoce of Protect Women Ohio, the Issue 1 opposition campaign. “Of course, if Issue 1 passed, we won't have those protections.”Mae Winchester, a Cleveland-based maternal fetal medicine specialist, said use of the term in the campaign messaging over the amendment is misleading.“‘Partial-birth abortion’ is a made-up term that only serves to create confusion and stigmatize abortion later in pregnancy,” she said. “It’s not a procedure that’s described anywhere in medical literature, and so it’s not considered a medical term or even an actual medical procedure.”Ohio passed the nation's first ban on what its lawmakers then dubbed “partial birth feticide” in 1995, just three years after Ohio physician Martin Haskell debuted the D&X procedure during an abortion practitioners conference. He touted it as a way to avoid an overnight hospital stay and as safer and less painful for women than other methods. Protect Women Ohio has invoked Haskell’s legacy in one of its ads. It shows an image of Haskell and describes the procedure he pioneered as “painful for the mother and the baby.” The voiceover then calls for a no vote on the amendment “so people like Dr. Haskell can't perform painful ‘late-term’ abortions.”The spot doesn’t note the distinction between “partial-birth” and “late-term” abortions — both non-medical terms coined by anti-abortion advocates — nor reference the federal ban.Mike Gonidakis, president of Ohio Right to Life, said because of protections provided to individuals and abortion providers in the amendment, “The ad withstands any scrutiny.”Haskell retired from active practice two years ago. He declined comment. But he has donated to the main group supporting the constitutional amendment, Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights.Pro-Choice Ohio Executive Director Kellie Copeland called talk of “late-term” and “partial-birth” abortions a scare tactic.“Issue 1 allows for clear restrictions on abortion after viability that protect patients’ health and safety,” she said. “These situations, when a woman needs an abortion later in pregnancy, are incredibly rare and heartbreaking for families.” Ohio hasn’t had an abortion of any type performed after 25 weeks’ gestation since 2018 and only four have been recorded since 2013, according to statistics compiled by the state Health Department. Abortions between 21 and 24 weeks’ gestation, a span that encompasses the outside limit of Ohio’s current law, totaled 576, or 0.6% of the total, over that time.Pritchard, of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, attributed the low numbers to the state's existing abortion restrictions.___Associated Press reporter Christine Fernando in Chicago contributed to this report.。 这座陪伴泉城市民21年的老牌水族地标，如今正站在去留的十字路口。商户们在去与留的焦灼中寻找退路，管理方回应“尚在商榷”。 管理方：合同10月底到期，去留仍存变数 “大约20多天前，我们突然得知了市场要关闭的消息。”经营水族店铺二十余年的王先生告诉记者。
二 | 8月23日下午，正值周末，市场内客流稀少，多处店面大门紧锁，卷帘门上贴着“招租”启事。据粗略统计，广场一、二层共设商铺69家，目前已有33家处于关门歇业状态。
记者以商户身份致电“招租”广告上的电话，工作人员表示：“租的话只能租到10月份。”问及具体原因，对方直言：“有规划。”
8月24日，记者就广场是否关停一事再次向管理方核实，对方回应称：“目前还没完全确定。10月31日是合同到期日，如果没有变动，我们会延续经营，但延续时间尚不确定。” 近半店面已歇业，老商户面临搬迁难题
王先生的店铺面积达106平方米，两年前刚花重金重新装修过。“周边基本都是二十年的老街坊，以前极少有退租更替的。
三 | ” 谈及经营现状，王先生叹了口气，坦言如今的营业额已断崖式跌至巅峰期的十分之一甚至二十分之一，“今天一整天营业额只有276元，算上房租和水电，连成本都保不住。
四 | ”店内近百个鱼缸的供氧、加温设备需要24小时不间断运转，高昂的固定开销让当下的坚守愈发艰难。
“以前周边摆地摊的小商贩都会来这儿批发，后来渠道变了，零散客流也越来越少。”同样在此坚守了二十多年的聂女士，眼下则面临着更加繁重的善后工作。 水族行业搬迁不同于普通零售，“大大小小的重型鱼缸怎么挪、活体水族怎么安全转运、新址水电线路怎么重新布设，都是难题。还没完全想好去哪，家里人今天下午已经先出去看新铺面了。”
真正让聂女士们犹豫的，不只是搬不动的鱼缸，更是这里二十多年攒下的人情和旧时光。 情怀难舍：鱼影里藏着济南人的旧时光
聂女士说，做水族这行，换了地方最怕老主顾断了线。在这座临湖而建的市场里，鱼游了二十余年，人也聚了二十余载。
五 | 泉城人爱水，也爱水里的生灵。不少老济南人的童年记忆里，都有一只圆玻璃鱼缸。透过略带畸变的弧面玻璃，一尾红尾巴轻轻一摆，就是整个夏天的欢愉。 龙睛、红虎头、大水泡，当年大明湖西南门早市上的瓦盆里，游着最地道的市井烟火。相中了哪一条，摊主用细篾小网轻轻一抄，一两块钱，便能把这份“水灵”兜回家中。 自2005年底开业以来，柏宁水族广场便成了这份市井雅趣的延续地。 在市场一角，养鱼十余年的市民孙先生正在挑选水草。
六 | 他家里养着几尾飘逸的“蝴蝶蓝”，上周刚买了一株造景水草，今天特意再来配个新色。“摆在缸里对称、好看，现在市场里不少店在打折，能捡个漏。” “二十多年的老市场了，关停了怪可惜的。
七 | ”谈及市场可能关停，孙先生又补了一句：“要是真搬了也没事，我都留着老板电话呢，到时候跟着地址找过去就是了。” 只是对商户们来说，搬家不只是搬鱼缸，更是搬动一条条靠年月攒起来的老主顾关系。无论最终迁往何方，这份浸润泉城岁月的市井人情，仍希望不会轻易断线。
Current article:http://www.chenzhuaigecoupuhongyuntuizei.sbs/news/20260826_4407564.xlsx
Published on:06:49:04
