绿箭侠

DPP’s rant against China-Indonesia drill exposes secessionist nature, reliance on external forces and deep-seated fears: expert_我的网站

A |     

    Chinese Navy's guided-missile frigate Honghe (Hull 523) and the Indonesian Navy frigate KRI I Gusti Ngurah Rai conduct a replenishment-at-sea exercise in waters east of China's Taiwan Island in August 2026. Photo: official WeChat account of the PLA Eastern Theater Command
Following China's Ministry of National Defense's announcement on Tuesday that the Chinese and Indonesian navies will hold a navigation exercise in waters east of Taiwan island in mid‑August, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) authorities on the island fiercely opposed and smeared this legitimate maritime military cooperation, while hyping up the so‑called "China threat" narrative. Their provocative response stands in stark contrast to their weak, accommodating stance toward Japan and the Philippines, whose illegal maritime delimitation in waters east of Taiwan has undermined China's legitimate maritime rights and interests.
Analysts pointed out that such reactions lay bare the DPP's secessionist mentality, its reliance on external forces to back "Taiwan independence" schemes, and its deep‑seated fear of the mainland's growing military capabilities to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity.
The Chinese Navy's Honghe guided-missile frigate (Hull 523) and Indonesia's frigate KRI I Gusti Ngurah Rai completed all scheduled exercises in waters east of China's Taiwan island on Wednesday morning, concluding a joint maritime passage exercise, according to the PLA Eastern Theater Command. The two vessels conducted drills including maritime communications, formation maneuvering, replenishment at sea and a farewell ceremony, demonstrating practical cooperation and their shared commitment to regional peace and stability.
In a statement on Wednesday, the DPP authorities' "external affairs" department smeared the drill as a "malicious provocation, irresponsible unilateral act that brings unrest and threats to the region." It claimed that it would vigorously safeguard its so‑called "sovereignty" over the waters east of Taiwan island. 
On Tuesday evening, the so-called Mainland Affairs Council on the island also smeared the exercises as an act "undermining regional peace and stability and challenging the international order," claiming that the exercises had seriously infringed upon its so‑called "national sovereignty" and maritime rights and interests.
Some media outlets have noted that choosing waters east of Taiwan island for the drill may relate to the Japan‑Philippines maritime delimitation issue. Observers meanwhile highlighted a stark contrast between the DPP authorities' willingness to endorse Japan and the Philippines' illegal maritime‑delimitation moves in waters east of Taiwan and their fiery rhetoric over the legitimate maritime drill between the Chinese mainland and Indonesia.
Some Taiwan‑based netizens also condemned the DPP's conduct. One user wrote beneath a Mainland Affairs Council Facebook post: "They would rather act as vassals to foreign states than let compatriots defend our maritime territory - the DPP are traitors to the nation."
"The Taiwan authorities simply have no so‑called 'national sovereignty.' Such remarks reflect the DPP authorities' secessionist ideology," said Wang Jianmin, a senior cross-Straits expert at Minnan Normal University in Fujian. He noted the stark contrast in the DPP authorities' positions also shows that they have never cared about genuine maritime rights and interests.
According to Wang, on one hand, the DPP authorities pin their hopes on external forces to back their Taiwan secession schemes and choose to compromise and yield on actual maritime interests. On the other hand, they deliberately fabricate the narrative of "the Chinese mainland unilaterally changing the status quo," in a bid to garner more attention and support for external forces.
In addition, as local elections on the island draw near, the DPP authorities seek to hype up the so‑called "military threat from the mainland" rhetoric, stoke anti‑mainland sentiment on the island and shift blame for various livelihood‑related social problems against the DPP, Wang noted. 
Since June this year, China Coast Guard (CCG) vessels have conducted regular law-enforcement patrols in waters east of Taiwan island, with the aim of exercising jurisdiction in accordance with the law and safeguarding China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests. The patrol came in response to Japan-Philippines' unilateral announcement of so-called "maritime delimitation negotiations" concerning waters east of Taiwan island in May, according to CCG's statement.
Previously, the PLA Eastern Theater Command conducted joint exercises codenamed "Justice Mission 2025" in the Taiwan Straits and in waters to the north, southwest, southeast, and east of the island.
For a long time, secessionists have clung to the illusion that the waters east of Taiwan island serve as a "security buffer zone," from which outside forces could intervene in the Taiwan Straits from this direction, said Wang. 
"However, the China-Indonesia naval drill in the waters east of Taiwan island further shatters secessionists' illusions," Wang said. "It demonstrates China's firm stance in safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity, and constitutes a stern warning to secessionists and external forces."
According to the expert, the reaction of the DPP authorities also lays bare the deep‑seated fear harbored by secessionists. 
"They are acutely mindful of the real possibility that the Chinese mainland may impose maritime containment around Taiwan island when necessary… Confronted with this scenario, the DPP authorities resort to nothing but loud rhetoric and empty posturing, which fully exposes the true nature of Taiwan secessionists: feigning ferocity while being fundamentally feeble and helpless," Wang said. 
。

B |     她说：“我很擅长制作动画，正从事一个项目，我从中赚的钱几乎与我的主要工作一样多，且工作时间更短，这还有助于磨炼我的技能并增加我的收入来源。”她正在兼职：在拥有全职工作的同时，向另一个雇主出售其技能。她并不认为其中有任何错误，她的公司要求她每周工作约40小时，只要诚实照做，她就自认为没理由不让她从事一项副业。

C | 然而，并非每个人都如此习以为常。

D | 近来，印度科技咨询公司威普罗解聘300名为竞争对手从事第二职业的员工，该公司董事长普雷姆吉强烈抨击科技行业的兼职行为，“这是赤裸裸的欺骗。

E | ”尽管该现象也存在于其他国家，但这在印度引发激烈争议，尤其是在科技行业。班加罗尔就业法专家戈帕拉克里希南表示，尽管兼职在印度并非新鲜事，但它在新冠肺炎疫情后变得更泛滥，因为员工开始远程工作。同时，雇主减少或放松监督，为员工从事另一份工作提供更多时间和网络带宽。

F | 威普罗的解聘举动为该话题带来更多声音：一些公司严厉警告员工不要为其他企业工作，或者试图对员工加强监督。

G | 但其他企业领导人正采取宽松路线，声称年轻员工只是努力进取。

H | 显而易见的是，随着科技行业为雄心勃勃的年轻员工开辟更多出售其技能的增收途径，公司需要考虑如何以一种双方都能理解的方式规范员工的行为。兼职是印度科技行业的公开秘密。

I | 调查发现，近65%的IT员工表示，他们或他们认识的人在居家办公期间兼职或寻求兼职机会。拥有大量员工的IT公司难以在其职工中营造主人翁意识和归属感。改善经济条件往往需要来自不止一份工作的报酬。印度“IT之都”班加罗尔提供的薪酬相对较高，但生活成本也是如此。除增收外，许多员工也希望提高技能或追寻激情。

J | 28岁的拉詹是当地某大软件公司的全职员工，但他也有自己的YouTube频道并通过广告赚钱。他说：“新冠肺炎疫情使我意识到，人们必须未雨绸缪，拥有可用以缓冲的储蓄。”就业法专家戈帕拉克里希南表示，从法律上看，情况很复杂，员工能否从事兼职或副业，主要取决于与主要雇主的雇佣合同。

K | 在她看来，一些公司确实允许员工按事先协议从事副业或与爱好有关的项目，前提是无利益冲突。IT员工组织NITES总裁萨卢加指出，多位印度科技大亨的创业都始于副业。印度电子和信息技术国务部长拉吉夫·钱德拉塞卡也站了出来，他指出年轻员工渴望将其技能变现并建立经济稳定性。显然，无论有多少不同观点，这场争论都不会消失。蒂雅发现，在新冠肺炎疫情期间，很容易保留两份工作，但她很快就将面临被重新召回办公室的现实。在她看来，她的第二份工作不仅与钱有关，也为她带来更多满足感。（作者卡尔帕纳·桑德，崔晓冬译）。

Current article:http://www.chenzhuaigecoupuhongyuntuizei.sbs/news/20260826_576.pptx

Published on:09:56:40